
TL;DR
This paper argues that integral formalism provides a more complete and consistent description of quantum systems, especially in the adiabatic limit, and clarifies the physical significance of Berry phase compared to differential formalism.
Contribution
It demonstrates that integral formalism captures Berry phase effects that differential formalism neglects, resolving inconsistencies in quantum adiabatic theorem.
Findings
Differential formalism leads to vanishing Berry phase.
Integral formalism correctly reproduces Berry phase.
In the adiabatic limit, integral formalism offers a complete description of quantum dynamics.
Abstract
To describe the physical reality, there are two ways of constructing the dynamical equation of field, differential formalism and integral formalism. The importance of this fact is firstly emphasized by Yang in case of gauge field [Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 445], where the fact has given rise to a deeper understanding for Aharonov-Bohm phase and magnetic monopole [Phys. Rev. D. 12 (1975) 3845]. In this paper we shall point out that such a fact also holds in general wave function of matter, it may give rise to a deeper understanding for Berry phase. Most importantly, we shall prove a point that, for general wave function of matter, in the adiabatic limit, there is an intrinsic difference between its integral formalism and differential formalism. It is neglect of this difference that leads to an inconsistency of quantum adiabatic theorem pointed out by Marzlin and Sanders [Phys. Rev.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
