Tuning Tempered Transitions
Gundula Behrens, Nial Friel, Merrilee Hurn

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how to tune the tempered transitions algorithm to improve acceptance rates in Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling from multimodal distributions, balancing computational cost and efficiency.
Contribution
It investigates tuning strategies for tempered transitions, especially the spacing of temperature levels, to enhance sampling efficiency.
Findings
Geometric temperature spacing is generally effective.
Tuning can significantly improve acceptance rates.
Some applications benefit from non-geometric temperature arrangements.
Abstract
The method of tempered transitions was proposed by Neal (1996) for tackling the difficulties arising when using Markov chain Monte Carlo to sample from multimodal distributions. In common with methods such as simulated tempering and Metropolis-coupled MCMC, the key idea is to utilise a series of successively easier to sample distributions to improve movement around the state space. Tempered transitions does this by incorporating moves through these less modal distributions into the MCMC proposals. Unfortunately the improved movement between modes comes at a high computational cost with a low acceptance rate of expensive proposals. We consider how the algorithm may be tuned to increase the acceptance rates for a given number of temperatures. We find that the commonly assumed geometric spacing of temperatures is reasonable in many but not all applications.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
