Morphology and Size Differences between Local & High Redshift Luminous Infrared Galaxies
Wiphu Rujopakarn, George H. Rieke, Daniel J. Eisenstein, and Stephanie, Juneau

TL;DR
This paper compares the physical scales of star-forming regions in local and high-redshift luminous infrared galaxies, finding that IR luminosity surface density better indicates their star-forming environment than IR luminosity alone.
Contribution
It introduces IR luminosity surface density as a more accurate metric for characterizing star-forming galaxies across cosmic time.
Findings
High-redshift LIRGs and ULIRGs have similar star-forming region sizes to local normal galaxies.
IR luminosity correlates with IR surface density over five orders of magnitude.
Local ULIRGs have smaller star-forming regions than high-redshift ULIRGs, diverging from the IR luminosity surface density correlation.
Abstract
We show that the star-forming regions in high-redshift luminous and ultraluminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs and ULIRGs) and submillimeter galaxies (SMGs) have similar physical scales to those in local normal star-forming galaxies. To first order, their higher infrared (IR) luminosities result from higher luminosity surface density. We also find a good correlation between the IR luminosity and IR luminosity surface density in starburst galaxies across over five orders of magnitude of IR luminosity from local normal galaxies to z ~ 2 SMGs. The intensely star-forming regions of local ULIRGs are significantly smaller than those in their high-redshift counterparts and hence diverge significantly from this correlation, indicating that the ULIRGs found locally are a different population from the high-redshift ULIRGs and SMGs. Based on this relationship, we suggest that luminosity surface…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
