Accuracy and effectualness of closed-form, frequency-domain waveforms for non-spinning black hole binaries

TL;DR

This study evaluates the effectiveness and accuracy of frequency-domain waveform templates for non-spinning black hole binaries, crucial for gravitational wave detection and parameter estimation with current and future detectors.

Contribution

It compares post-Newtonian and phenomenological models against effective one body waveforms, highlighting their limitations in effectualness and accuracy for advanced detectors.

Findings

Effectualness >97% for initial detectors across parameter space

Both models fail to meet accuracy standards in large parameter regions

Maximum frequency for joining PN and EOB waveforms depends on mass ratio

Abstract

The coalescences of binary black hole (BBH) systems, here taken to be non-spinning, are among the most promising sources for gravitational wave (GW) ground-based detectors, such as LIGO and Virgo. To detect the GW signals emitted by BBHs, and measure the parameters of the source, one needs to have in hand a bank of GW templates that are both effectual (for detection), and accurate (for measurement). We study the effectualness and the accuracy of the two types of parametrized banks of templates that are directly defined in the frequency-domain by means of closed-form expressions, namely 'post-Newtonian' (PN) and 'phenomenological' models. In absence of knowledge of the exact waveforms, our study assumes as fiducial, target waveforms the ones generated by the most accurate version of the effective one body (EOB) formalism. We find that, for initial GW detectors the use, at each point of parameter space, of the best closed-form template (among PN and phenomenological models) leads to an effectualness >97% over the entire mass range and >99% in an important fraction of parameter space; however, when considering advanced detectors, both of the closed-form frequency-domain models fail to be effectual enough in significant domains of the two-dimensional [total mass and mass ratio] parameter space. Moreover, we find that, both for initial and advanced detectors, the two closed-form frequency-domain models fail to satisfy the minimal required accuracy standard in a very large domain of the two-dimensional parameter space. In addition, a side result of our study is the determination, as a function of the mass ratio, of the maximum frequency at which a frequency-domain PN waveform can be 'joined' onto a NR-calibrated EOB waveform without undue loss of accuracy.