The Size Distribution of the Neptune Trojans and the Missing Intermediate Sized Planetesimals
Scott S. Sheppard (Carnegie Institution) Chadwick A. Trujillo (Gemini)

TL;DR
This study used deep telescopic surveys to analyze Neptune Trojans, revealing a scarcity of intermediate-sized objects and supporting the idea that planetesimals formed directly from small to large sizes, not through collisional processes.
Contribution
It provides the first ultra-deep survey of Neptune Trojans, identifying a size distribution rollover and supporting the primordial origin of planetesimals.
Findings
Scarcity of Neptune Trojans smaller than 45 km radius.
Size distribution follows a steep power-law for larger objects.
Evidence for missing intermediate-sized planetesimals across the solar system.
Abstract
We present an ultra-deep survey for Neptune Trojans using the Subaru 8.2-m and Magellan 6.5-m telescopes. The survey reached a 50% detection efficiency in the R-band at 25.7 magnitudes and covered 49 square degrees of sky. This depth corresponds to Neptune Trojans that are about 16 km in radius (assuming an albedo of 0.05). A paucity of smaller Neptune Trojans (radii < 45 km) compared to larger ones was found. The brightest Neptune Trojans appear to follow a steep power-law slope (q = 5+-1) similar to the brightest objects in the other known stable reservoirs such as the Kuiper Belt, Jupiter Trojans and main belt asteroids. We find a roll-over for the Neptune Trojans that occurs around a radii of r=45+-10 km (23.5+-0.3 mags), which is also very similar to the other stable reservoirs. All the observed stable regions in the the solar system show evidence for Missing Intermediate Sized…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
