The VIMOS VLT Deep Survey: the contribution of minor mergers to the growth of L_B >= L*_B galaxies since z ~ 1 from spectroscopically identified pairs
C. L\'opez-Sanjuan, O. Le F\`evre, L. de Ravel, O. Cucciati, O., Ilbert, L. Tresse, S. Bardelli, M. Bolzonella, T. Contini, B. Garilli, L., Guzzo, D. Maccagni, H. J. McCraken, Y. Mellier, A. Pollo, D. Vergani, E., Zucca

TL;DR
This study quantifies how minor and major mergers have contributed to the mass growth of luminous galaxies since redshift 1, highlighting the evolving role of mergers in galaxy evolution.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of merger fractions for luminous galaxies, distinguishing between minor and major mergers and their impact on galaxy growth since z ~ 1.
Findings
Minor mergers contribute ~25% to galaxy mass growth since z ~ 1.
Major mergers account for ~75% of the mass increase.
Red galaxies experience higher merger fractions and less evolution over time.
Abstract
In this work we measure the merger fraction, f_m, of L_B >= L*_B galaxies in the VVDS-Deep spectroscopic Survey. We define kinematical close pairs as those galaxies with a separation in the sky plane 5h^-1 kpc < r_p <= r_p^max and a relative velocity Delta v <= 500 km s^-1 in redshift space. We vary r_p^max from 30h^-1 kpc to 100h^-1 kpc. We study f_m in two redshift intervals and for several values of mu, the B-band luminosity ratio of the galaxies in the pair, from 1/2 to 1/10. We take mu >= 1/4 and 1/10 <= mu < 1/4 as major and minor mergers. The merger fraction increases with z and its dependence on mu is described well as f_m (>= mu) proportional to mu^s. The value of s evolves from s = -0.60 +- 0.08 at z = 0.8 to s = -1.02 +- 0.13 at z = 0.5. The fraction of minor mergers for bright galaxies evolves with redshift as a power-law (1+z)^m with index m = -0.4 +- 0.7 for the merger…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
