Measurements of Transit Timing Variations for WASP-5b
Akihiko Fukui, Norio Narita, Paul J. Tristram, Takahiro Sumi, Fumio, Abe, Yoshitaka Itow, Denis J. Sullivan, Ian A. Bond, Teruyuki Hirano,, Motohide Tamura, David P. Bennett, Kei Furusawa, Fumiya Hayashi, John B., Hearnshaw, Shun Hosaka, Koki Kamiya, Shuhei Kobara, Aarno Korpela

TL;DR
This study reports new transit observations of WASP-5b, finds evidence of transit timing variations possibly caused by additional planets, and places limits on their masses using combined photometric and radial velocity data.
Contribution
It provides the first detection of potential TTVs for WASP-5b and constrains the properties of possible secondary planets through combined observational and numerical analysis.
Findings
Transit timing variations up to 50 seconds observed.
Upper mass limit of 2 Earth masses near 1:2 and 2:1 MMRs.
Possible secondary planet orbit near low-order MMRs.
Abstract
We have observed 7 new transits of the `hot Jupiter' WASP-5b using a 61 cm telescope located in New Zealand, in order to search for transit timing variations (TTVs) which can be induced by additional bodies existing in the system. When combined with other available photometric and radial velocity (RV) data, we find that its transit timings do not match a linear ephemeris; the best fit \chi^2 values is 32.2 with 9 degrees of freedom which corresponds to a confidence level of 99.982 % or 3.7 \sigma. This result indicates that excess variations of transit timings has been observed, due either to unknown systematic effects or possibly to real TTVs. The TTV amplitude is as large as 50 s, and if this is real, it cannot be explained by other effects than that due to an additional body or bodies. From the RV data, we put an upper limit on the RV amplitude caused by the possible secondary body…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
