Can neutralinos in the MSSM and NMSSM scenarios still be light?
Daniel Albornoz Vasquez, Genevieve Belanger, Celine Boehm, Alexander, Pukhov, Joseph Silk

TL;DR
This paper examines the viability of light neutralinos in the MSSM and NMSSM models, concluding that light neutralinos are ruled out in MSSM but remain possible in NMSSM, with some compatible with recent direct detection signals.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis showing that light neutralinos are excluded in MSSM due to collider constraints but remain viable in NMSSM, potentially explaining recent direct detection signals.
Findings
Light neutralinos are ruled out in MSSM by TEVATRON limits.
In NMSSM, light neutralinos can still be consistent with experimental bounds.
Neutralinos should be heavier than approximately 28 GeV in MSSM to satisfy current constraints.
Abstract
Since the recent results of direct detection experiments at low mass, many authors have revisited the case of light (1 -10) GeV WIMPs. In particular, there have been a few attempts to explain the results from the DAMA/LIBRA, CDMS and/or CoGeNT experiments by invoking neutralinos lighter than 15 GeV. Here we show that in the MSSM, such light particles are completely ruled out by the TEVATRON limits on the mass of the pseudoscalar Higgs. On the contrary, in the NMSSM, we find that light neutralinos could still be viable candidates. In fact, in some cases, they may even have an elastic scattering cross section on nucleons in the range that is needed to explain either the DAMA/LIBRA, CoGeNT or CDMS recent results. Finally, we revisit the lowest limit on the neutralino mass in the MSSM and find that neutralinos should be heavier than ~28 GeV to evade present experimental bounds.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
