
TL;DR
This paper characterizes the possible biases in secure remote coin flipping protocols with multiple sources, showing how privacy constraints limit the achievable bias based on the number of sources and colluding parties.
Contribution
It provides a complete characterization of the biases achievable in secure coin flipping with multiple sources under different privacy constraints, improving upon prior work by Yao.
Findings
Bias can be any rational number when half or more sources are compromised.
Bias can be any algebraic number when fewer than half sources are compromised.
The results have applications in secure multiparty computation.
Abstract
Alice seeks an information-theoretically secure source of private random data. Unfortunately, she lacks a personal source and must use remote sources controlled by other parties. Alice wants to simulate a coin flip of specified bias , as a function of data she receives from sources; she seeks privacy from any coalition of of them. We show: If , the bias can be any rational number and nothing else; if , the bias can be any algebraic number and nothing else. The proof uses projective varieties, convex geometry, and the probabilistic method. Our results improve on those laid out by Yao, who asserts one direction of the case in his seminal paper [Yao82]. We also provide an application to secure multiparty computation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
