Selection of ULIRGs in Infrared and Submm Surveys
M. Symeonidis, M. J. Page, N. Seymour

TL;DR
This study analyzes how different infrared and submillimeter surveys detect ULIRGs across redshifts, revealing biases towards certain dust temperatures and challenging the applicability of local temperature-luminosity relations at high redshift.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive assessment of survey selection effects on ULIRG temperature detection and proposes that high-redshift ULIRG evolution is temperature-dependent, not solely due to an evolving L-T relation.
Findings
Short wavelength surveys detect a wide temperature range of ULIRGs.
Long wavelength surveys favor colder ULIRGs, even at low redshift.
High-redshift ULIRG temperature distribution differs from local universe, not explained by local L-T relation.
Abstract
We examine the selection characteristics of infrared and sub-mm surveys with IRAS, Spitzer, BLAST, Herschel and SCUBA and identify the range of dust temperatures these surveys are sensitive to, for galaxies in the ULIRG luminosity range (12<log(LIR)<13), between z=0 and z=4. We find that the extent of the redshift range over which surveys are unbiased is a function of the wavelength of selection, flux density limit and ULIRG luminosity. Short wavelength (<200{\mu}m) surveys with IRAS, Spitzer/MIPS and Herschel/PACS are sensitive to all SED types in a large temperature interval (17-87K), over a substantial fraction of their accessible redshift range. On the other hand, long wavelength (>200{\mu}m) surveys with BLAST, Herschel/ SPIRE and SCUBA are significantly more sensitive to cold ULIRGs, disfavouring warmer SEDs even at low redshifts. We evaluate observations in the context of survey…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
