Type Ia Supernovae and Accretion Induced Collapse
A. J. Ruiter, K. Belczynski, S. A. Sim, W. Hillebrandt, M. Fink, M., Kromer

TL;DR
This paper uses binary evolution simulations to analyze various progenitor channels of Type Ia supernovae, emphasizing the significance of the sub-Chandrasekhar mass scenario in explaining observed rates and delay times.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive theoretical analysis of Type Ia supernova progenitors, highlighting the dominant role of the sub-Chandrasekhar mass channel in supernova rates.
Findings
Sub-Chandrasekhar mass SNe Ia dominate at 0.7-4 Gyr after star formation.
Delay time distribution includes prompt (<500 Myr) and delayed (>800 Myr) channels.
Standard models suggest only the sub-Chandrasekhar scenario fully explains observed rates.
Abstract
Using the population synthesis binary evolution code StarTrack, we present theoretical rates and delay times of Type Ia supernovae arising from various formation channels. These channels include binaries in which the exploding white dwarf reaches the Chandrasekhar mass limit (DDS, SDS, and helium-rich donor scenario) as well as the sub-Chandrasekhar mass scenario, in which a white dwarf accretes from a helium-rich companion and explodes as a SN Ia before reaching the Chandrasekhar mass limit. We find that using a common envelope parameterization employing energy balance with alpha=1 and lambda=1, the supernova rates per unit mass (born in stars) of sub-Chandrasekhar mass SNe Ia exceed those of all other progenitor channels at epochs t=0.7 - 4 Gyr for a burst of star formation at t=0. Additionally, the delay time distribution of the sub-Chandrasekhar model can be divided in to two…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
