High redshift Fermi blazars
G. Ghisellini (1), G. Tagliaferri (1), L. Foschini (1), G. Ghirlanda, (1), F. Tavecchio (1), R. Della Ceca (1), F. Haardt (2), M. Volonteri (3), N., Gehrels (4) ((1) INAF sservatorio di Brera, (2) Univ. Insubria, Como, (3), Univ. of Michigan, (4) Goddard Space Flight Center)

TL;DR
This paper analyzes high-redshift Fermi blazars, modeling their spectral energy distributions to understand jet physics, black hole properties, and their relation to accretion, confirming correlations and the blazar sequence at large distances.
Contribution
It provides detailed modeling of high-redshift Fermi blazars, estimating their physical parameters and confirming the blazar sequence's applicability to distant sources.
Findings
Jet power correlates with accretion luminosity.
High energy peak shifts to smaller frequencies with increasing luminosity.
Hard X-ray band is optimal for detecting luminous distant blazars.
Abstract
With the release of the first year Fermi catalogue, the number of blazars detected above 100 MeV lying at high redshift has been largely increased. There are 28 blazars at z>2 in the "clean" sample. All of them are Flat Spectrum Radio Quasars (FSRQs). We study and model their overall spectral energy distribution in order to find the physical parameters of the jet emitting region, and for all of them we estimate their black hole masses and accretion rates. We then compare the jet with the accretion disk properties, setting these sources in the broader context of all the other bright gamma-ray or hard X-ray blazars. We confirm that the jet power correlates with the accretion luminosity. We find that the high energy emission peak shifts to smaller frequencies as the observed luminosity increases, according to the blazar sequence, making the hard X-ray band the most suitable for searching…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
