What we understand is what we get: Assessment in Spreadsheets
Andrea Kohlhase, Michael Kohlhase

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the SACHS system's ability to improve understanding of spreadsheets, demonstrating its benefits and limitations in providing explanations for financial controlling data.
Contribution
It introduces an assessment module for SACHS to enhance spreadsheet comprehension and evaluates its effectiveness in a financial context.
Findings
SACHS significantly improves spreadsheet understanding
The system misses some important explanation classes
Assessment module provides a first step towards better evaluation
Abstract
In previous work we have studied how an explicit representation of background knowledge associated with a specific spreadsheet can be exploited to alleviate usability problems with spreadsheet-based applications. We have implemented this approach in the SACHS system to provide a semantic help system for spreadsheets applications. In this paper, we evaluate the (comprehension) coverage of SACHS on an Excel-based financial controlling system via a "Wizard-of-Oz" experiment. This shows that SACHS adds significant value, but systematically misses important classes of explanations. For judgements about the information contained in spreadsheets, we provide a first approach for an "assessment module" in SACHS.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpreadsheets and End-User Computing · Engineering Education and Pedagogy · Statistics Education and Methodologies
