Comment on "Isotope effect in multi-band and multi-channel attractive systems and inverse isotope effect in iron-based superconductors" by T. Yanagisawa, et al
Annette Bussmann-Holder, Hugo Keller

TL;DR
This paper critiques a theoretical claim that an inverse isotope effect can occur in iron-based superconductors, highlighting misleading assumptions and contrasting experimental results that question the validity of the theory.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis of the theoretical model claiming inverse isotope effects, emphasizing the importance of accurate assumptions and experimental validation.
Findings
Contradicts the theoretical claim of inverse isotope effect in iron-based superconductors.
Highlights conflicting experimental results on isotope exponents in Ba,KFe2As2.
Questions the assumptions used in the theoretical analysis of isotope effects.
Abstract
In a recent paper Yanagisawa et al. [1] claim from a theoretical analysis of a multi-channel multi-band superconductor model that an inverse isotope exponent on the superconducting transition temperature Tc can be realized in iron-based superconductors. Simultaneously, a subgroup of the authors of Ref. 1 performed the corresponding isotope effect experiment on (Ba, K)Fe2As2 by investigating the iron isotope exchange effect on Tc [2]. In accordance with their theoretical analysis they indeed report an unusually large sign reversed isotope exponent of {\alpha} \simeq -0.18(3) which is in strong contrast to previous experiments on the nominally same system with the same composition in Ba, K content, namely Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2 [3], where the exponent was determined to be {\alpha} \simeq 0.37(3). This conflict remains unsolved until now with the exception of Ref. 4 where the iron isotope…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
