Is Witsenhausen's counterexample a relevant toy?
Pulkit Grover, Anant Sahai

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relevance of Witsenhausen's counterexample as a toy problem in decentralized control, showing that nonlinear strategies outperform linear ones across various formulations, thus affirming its significance.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that nonlinear strategies outperform linear ones in generalized Witsenhausen problems, extending understanding beyond the classical LQG formulation.
Findings
Nonlinear strategies outperform linear ones in bounded noise variants.
Results hold across different formulations, including adversarial extensions.
Simplified proofs due to bounded noise assumptions enhance pedagogical value.
Abstract
This paper answers a question raised by Doyle on the relevance of the Witsenhausen counterexample as a toy decentralized control problem. The question has two sides, the first of which focuses on the lack of an external channel in the counterexample. Using existing results, we argue that the core difficulty in the counterexample is retained even in the presence of such a channel. The second side questions the LQG formulation of the counterexample. We consider alternative formulations and show that the understanding developed for the LQG case guides the investigation for these other cases as well. Specifically, we consider 1) a variation on the original counterexample with general, but bounded, noise distributions, and 2) an adversarial extension with bounded disturbance and quadratic costs. For each of these formulations, we show that quantization-based nonlinear strategies outperform…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
