Concave Renewal Functions Do Not Imply DFR Inter-Renewal Times
Yaming Yu

TL;DR
This paper disproves Brown's conjecture by providing counter-examples showing that concave renewal functions do not necessarily imply DFR inter-renewal times, and also confirms the closure of DFR under geometric compounding.
Contribution
It provides the first counter-examples to Brown's conjecture and offers a concise proof of DFR closure under geometric compounding.
Findings
Counter-examples to Brown's conjecture
Concave renewal functions do not imply DFR inter-renewal times
DFR property is closed under geometric compounding
Abstract
Brown (1980, 1981) proved that the renewal function is concave if the inter-renewal distribution is DFR (decreasing failure rate), and conjectured the converse. This note settles Brown's conjecture with a class of counter-examples. We also give a short proof of Shanthikumar's (1988) result that the DFR property is closed under geometric compounding.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
