Estimating the phase in ground-based interferometry: performance comparison between single-mode and multimode schemes
E. Tatulli, N. Blind, J.P. Berger, A. Chelli, F. Malbet

TL;DR
This paper compares single-mode and multimode interferometry for phase estimation, showing single-mode often outperforms multimode in high flux and poor adaptive optics conditions, with specific advantages in robustness and performance.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical framework for phase error analysis and demonstrates the conditions under which single-mode interferometry surpasses multimode schemes.
Findings
Single-mode interferometry performs better in high flux regimes.
Single-mode is more robust to atmospheric turbulence.
Multimode performs slightly better in low light, detector noise regimes.
Abstract
In this paper we compare the performance of multi and single-mode interferometry for the estimation of the phase of the complex visibility. We provide a theoretical description of the interferometric signal which enables to derive the phase error in presence of detector, photon and atmospheric noises, for both multi and single-mode cases. We show that, despite the loss of flux occurring when injecting the light in the single-mode component (i.e. single-mode fibers, integrated optics), the spatial filtering properties of such single-mode devices often enable higher performance than multimode concepts. In the high flux regime speckle noise dominated, single-mode interferometry is always more efficient, and its performance is significantly better when the correction provided by adaptive optics becomes poor, by a factor of 2 and more when the Strehl ratio is lower than 10%. In low light…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
