On the Masses of Galaxies in the Local Universe
Edward N Taylor, Marijn Franx, Jarle Brinchmann, Arjen van der Wel,, Pieter G. van Dokkum

TL;DR
This study compares stellar and dynamical mass estimates for SDSS galaxies, revealing that galaxy structure significantly affects dynamical mass calculations and that a structure-corrected approach aligns well with stellar mass.
Contribution
It introduces a structure-corrected dynamical mass estimator that accounts for galaxy profile differences, improving the accuracy of mass relations.
Findings
Dynamical mass relates non-linearly to stellar mass with Mstar ≈ Mdyn^0.73.
Structure correction reduces scatter and aligns dynamical mass with stellar mass.
Galaxy non-homology significantly impacts dynamical mass estimates.
Abstract
We compare estimates of stellar mass, Mstar, and dynamical mass,Mdyn,for a sample of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We assume dynamical homology (i.e., Mdyn = dispersion**2 * Reff, and we find a tight but strongly non-linear relation: the best fit relation is Mstar = Mdyn**0.73, with an observed scatter of 0.15 dex. We also find that, at fixed Mstar, the ratio Mstar/Mdyn depends strongly on galaxy structure, as parameterized by Sersic index, n. The size of the differential effect is on the order of 0.6 dex across 2 < n < 10. The apparent n-dependence of Mstar/Mdyn is similar to expectations from simple models, indicating that assuming homology gives the wrong dynamical mass. We have also derived dynamical mass estimates that explicitly account for differences in galaxies' profiles. Using this `structure-corrected' dynamical mass estimator, M(dyn,n), the best fit…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
