Generic Misalignment Aberration Patterns in Wide-Field Telescopes
Paul L. Schechter, Rebecca Sobel Levinson

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how small misalignments in wide-field telescopes produce specific aberration patterns, and discusses methods for measuring and correcting these to maintain optimal alignment.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive framework for understanding and measuring misalignment aberration patterns, including third- and fifth-order patterns, in wide-field telescopes.
Findings
Misalignment patterns are characterized by two-dimensional vectors.
Measuring certain patterns can help maintain telescope alignment.
Fifth-order patterns are less sensitive to misalignments.
Abstract
Axially symmetric telescopes produce well known "Seidel" off-axis third-order aberration patterns: coma, astigmatism, curvature of field and distortion. When axial symmetry is broken by the small misalignments of optical elements, additional third-order aberration patterns arise: one each for coma, astigmatism and curvature of field and two for distortion. Each of these misalignment patterns is characterized by an associated two-dimensional vector, each of which in turn is a linear combination of the tilt and decenter vectors of the individual optical elements. For an N-mirror telescope, 2(N-1) patterns must be measured to keep the telescope aligned. Alignment of the focal plane may require two additional patterns. For N = 3, as in a three mirror anastigmat, there is a two-dimensional "subspace of benign misalignment" over which the misalignment patterns for third-order coma,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
