Non-Kosterlitz-Thouless transitions for the $q$-state clock models
Seung Ki Baek, Petter Minnhagen

TL;DR
This paper investigates phase transitions in q-state clock models, revealing that for q=5 the transition differs from the Kosterlitz-Thouless type, and shows how potential modifications can alter the nature of these transitions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the q=5 clock model exhibits a non-KT transition and that potential modifications can switch the transition type, challenging previous assumptions about these models.
Findings
Helicity modulus does not vanish at the high-temperature transition for q=5.
Modifying the interaction potential changes the transition type.
KT transition can be restored with the Villain potential for q=5.
Abstract
The -state clock model with the cosine potential has a single phase transition for and two transitions for . It is shown by Monte Carlo simulations that the helicity modulus for the five-state clock model () does not vanish at the high-temperature transition. This is in contrast to the clock models with for which the helicity modulus vanishes. This means that the transition for the five-state clock model differs from the Kosterlitz-Thouless (KT) transition. It is also shown that this change in the transition is caused by an interplay between the number of angular directions and the interaction potential: by slightly modifying the interaction potential, the KT transition for turns into the same non-KT transition. Likewise, the KT transition is recovered for when the Villain potential is used. Comparisons with other clock-model results are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
