A Complexity View of Markets with Social Influence

TL;DR

This paper explores how social influence affects the computational complexity of finding market equilibria, revealing increased difficulty even with simple influence networks and challenging previous assumptions about markets with few goods.

Contribution

It provides complexity-theoretic and algorithmic insights into market equilibria under social influence, including hardness results and algorithms for specific influence models.

Findings

Bounded-degree planar influence networks increase equilibrium computation difficulty.

Approximate equilibria may be easier in hierarchical influence networks.

Counterexample shows constant goods markets can be PPAD-hard to approximate.

Abstract

In this paper, inspired by the work of Megiddo on the formation of preferences and strategic analysis, we consider an early market model studied in the field of economic theory, in which each trader's utility may be influenced by the bundles of goods obtained by her social neighbors. The goal of this paper is to understand and characterize the impact of social influence on the complexity of computing and approximating market equilibria. We present complexity-theoretic and algorithmic results for approximating market equilibria in this model with focus on two concrete influence models based on the traditional linear utility functions. Recall that an Arrow-Debreu market equilibrium in a conventional exchange market with linear utility functions can be computed in polynomial time by convex programming. Our complexity results show that even a bounded-degree, planar influence network can significantly increase the difficulty of equilibrium computation even in markets with only a constant number of goods. Our algorithmic results suggest that finding an approximate equilibrium in markets with hierarchical influence networks might be easier than that in markets with arbitrary neighborhood structures. By demonstrating a simple market with a constant number of goods and a bounded-degree, planar influence graph whose equilibrium is PPAD-hard to approximate, we also provide a counterexample to a common belief, which we refer to as the myth of a constant number of goods, that equilibria in markets with a constant number of goods are easy to compute or easy to approximate.