Impact of shell crossing and scope of perturbative approaches in real and redshift space
Patrick Valageas

TL;DR
This paper assesses the effectiveness of perturbative approaches in modeling the matter power spectrum, highlighting their increasing relevance at higher redshifts and the potential to extend their applicability beyond the linear regime.
Contribution
It introduces a comparison between perturbative and nonperturbative effects using Zeldovich dynamics and a new 'sticky model' to evaluate the scope of perturbative methods in real and redshift space.
Findings
Perturbative schemes are more effective at higher redshifts.
Perturbation theory can be extended to higher orders before nonperturbative effects dominate.
Redshift-space distortions influence the applicability of perturbative expansions.
Abstract
We study the effect of nonperturbative corrections associated with the behavior of particles after shell crossing on the matter power spectrum. We compare their amplitude with the perturbative terms that can be obtained within the fluid description of the system, to estimate the range of scales where such perturbative approaches are relevant. We use the simple Zeldovich dynamics as a benchmark, as it allows the exact computation of the full nonlinear power spectrum and of perturbative terms at all orders. Then, we introduce a "sticky model" that coincides with the Zeldovich dynamics before shell crossing but shows a different behavior afterwards. Thus, their power spectra only differ in their nonperturbative terms. We consider both the real-space and redshift-space power spectra. We find that the potential of perturbative schemes is greater at higher redshift for a CDM…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
