Students' Consistency of Graphical Vector Addition Method on 2-D Vector Addition Tasks
Jeffrey M. Hawkins, John R. Thompson, Michael Wittmann

TL;DR
This study investigates how students' solution methods in 2-D vector addition tasks remain consistent or change across different visual representations, revealing insights into their problem-solving strategies.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on students' solution consistency and the impact of visual representation changes on their approach to vector addition.
Findings
Most students used a single solution method across variations.
Visual changes often did not lead to method changes.
Some students altered their approach when visual cues changed.
Abstract
In a series of ten two-dimensional graphical vector addition questions with varying visual representations, most students stuck to a single solution method, be it correct or incorrect. Changes to the visual representation include placing vectors on a grid, making the vectors arrangements symmetric, varying the separation between vectors, and reversing the direction of either vector. We discuss the questions asked of students and their responses, emphasizing the results of one student who did change solution methods during an interview.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTeaching and Learning Programming · Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques · Science Education and Pedagogy
