Galaxy protocluster candidates around z ~ 2.4 radio galaxies
N. A. Hatch, C. De Breuck, A. Galametz, G. K. Miley, R. A. Overzier,, H. J. A. R\"ottgering, M. Doherty, T. Kodama, J. D. Kurk, N. Seymour, B. P., Venemans, J. Vernet, and A. W. Zirm

TL;DR
This study investigates the environments of six high-redshift radio galaxies, revealing significant galaxy overdensities that are likely protoclusters, with most galaxies actively forming stars and potential to evolve into galaxy clusters.
Contribution
First detailed analysis of galaxy overdensities around z ~ 2.4 radio galaxies, identifying candidate protoclusters with properties consistent with future galaxy clusters.
Findings
Three radio galaxies are surrounded by significant galaxy overdensities.
Overdensities have masses exceeding 10^14 solar masses, likely collapsing into virialized structures.
Protocluster galaxies predominantly exhibit blue, star-forming characteristics.
Abstract
We study the environments of 6 radio galaxies at 2.2 < z < 2.6 using wide-field near-infrared images. We use colour cuts to identify galaxies in this redshift range, and find that three of the radio galaxies are surrounded by significant surface overdensities of such galaxies. The excess galaxies that comprise these overdensities are strongly clustered, suggesting they are physically associated. The colour distribution of the galaxies responsible for the overdensity are consistent with those of galaxies that lie within a narrow redshift range at z ~ 2.4. Thus the excess galaxies are consistent with being companions of the radio galaxies. The overdensities have estimated masses in excess of 10^14 solar masses, and are dense enough to collapse into virizalised structures by the present day: these structures may evolve into groups or clusters of galaxies. A flux-limited sample of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
