Measuring star formation in high-z massive galaxies: A mid-infrared to submillimeter study of the GOODS NICMOS Survey sample
Marco P. Viero, Lorenzo Moncelsi, Erin Mentuch, Fernando Buitrago,, Amanda. E. Bauer, Edward L. Chapin, Christopher J. Conselice, Mark J. Devlin,, Mark Halpern, Gaelen Marsden, Calvin B. Netterfield, Enzo Pascale, Pablo. G., P\'erez-Gonz\'alez, Marie Rex, Douglas Scott

TL;DR
This study measures the average star formation rates of massive high-redshift galaxies using multi-wavelength stacking, revealing that disk-like galaxies dominate star formation and may influence galaxy size evolution.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive mid-infrared to submillimeter flux measurements for high-z massive galaxies and highlights the importance of galaxy morphology in star formation activity.
Findings
Disk-like galaxies have higher star formation rates than spheroid-like galaxies.
Star formation could contribute to size evolution of high-z galaxies.
Proper statistical treatment is crucial for stacking analyses.
Abstract
We present measurements of the mean mid-infrared-to-submillimeter flux densities of massive (M\ast \approx 2 \times 10^11 Msun) galaxies at redshifts 1.7 < z < 2.9, obtained by stacking positions of known objects taken from the GOODS NICMOS Survey (GNS) catalog on maps: at 24 {\mu}m (Spitzer/MIPS); 70, 100, and 160{\mu}m (Herschel/PACS); 250, 350, 500{\mu}m (BLAST); and 870{\mu}m (LABOCA). A modified blackbody spectrum fit to the stacked flux densities indicates a median [interquartile] star-formation rate of SFR = 63 [48, 81] Msun yr^-1 . We note that not properly accounting for correlations between bands when fitting stacked data can significantly bias the result. The galaxies are divided into two groups, disk-like and spheroid-like, according to their Sersic indices, n. We find evidence that most of the star formation is occurring in n \leq 2 (disk-like) galaxies, with median…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
