Potentials of Mean Force for Protein Structure Prediction Vindicated, Formalized and Generalized
Thomas Hamelryck, Mikael Borg, Martin Paluszewski, Jonas Paulsen, Jes, Frellsen, Christian Andreetta, Wouter Boomsma, Sandro Bottaro, Jesper, Ferkinghoff-Borg

TL;DR
This paper redefines potentials of mean force (PMFs) in protein structure prediction as reference ratio distributions, providing a rigorous probabilistic foundation, broadening their applicability, and clarifying their limitations.
Contribution
It introduces a new probabilistic interpretation of PMFs as reference ratio distributions, generalizing their use beyond pairwise distances and resolving longstanding debates.
Findings
PMFs are approximations to reference ratio distributions with rigorous justification.
The approach can be extended to arbitrary protein features.
Application to radius of gyration and hydrogen bonding demonstrates practical utility.
Abstract
Understanding protein structure is of crucial importance in science, medicine and biotechnology. For about two decades, knowledge based potentials based on pairwise distances -- so-called "potentials of mean force" (PMFs) -- have been center stage in the prediction and design of protein structure and the simulation of protein folding. However, the validity, scope and limitations of these potentials are still vigorously debated and disputed, and the optimal choice of the reference state -- a necessary component of these potentials -- is an unsolved problem. PMFs are loosely justified by analogy to the reversible work theorem in statistical physics, or by a statistical argument based on a likelihood function. Both justifications are insightful but leave many questions unanswered. Here, we show for the first time that PMFs can be seen as approximations to quantities that do have a rigorous…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
