Evolution of Galaxy Stellar Mass Functions, Mass Densities, and Mass to Light Ratios from z 7 to z 4
Valentino Gonzalez (UCSC), Ivo Labbe (OCIW), Rychard Bouwens, (UCSC/Leiden), Garth Illingworth (UCSC), Marijn Franx (Leiden), and Mariska, Kriek (Princeton)

TL;DR
This study derives galaxy stellar mass functions from z 7 to z 4 using deep Hubble and Spitzer data, revealing a steepening of the mass function slopes and a significant growth in stellar mass density over this period.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed mass-luminosity relation at z 4 and uses it to derive more accurate galaxy mass functions and stellar mass densities from z 7 to z 4.
Findings
Steeper low-mass slopes of the mass functions (α_M -1.4 to -1.6).
A growth in stellar mass density proportional to (1+z)^{-3.4} from z 7 to z 4.
A well-defined mass-luminosity relation with luminosity-dependent M/L ratios at z 4.
Abstract
We derive stellar masses from SED fitting to rest-frame optical and UV fluxes for 401 star-forming galaxies at z 4, 5, and 6 from Hubble-WFC3/IR observations of the ERS combined with the deep GOODS-S Spitzer/IRAC data (and include a previously-published z 7 sample). A mass-luminosity relation with strongly luminosity-dependent M/Luv ratios is found for the largest sample (299 galaxies) at z 4. The relation M \propto L_{UV,1500}^(1.7+/-0.2) has a well-determined intrinsic sample variance of 0.5 dex. This relation is also consistent with the more limited samples at z 5-7. This z 4 mass-luminosity relation, and the well-established faint UV luminosity functions at z 4-7, are used to derive galaxy mass functions (MF) to masses M~10^8 at z 4-7. A bootstap approach is used to derive the MFs to account for the large scatter in the M--Luv relation and the luminosity function uncertainties,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
