How much measurement independence is needed in order to demonstrate nonlocality?
Jonathan Barrett, Nicolas Gisin

TL;DR
This paper investigates how much measurement independence is necessary to demonstrate quantum nonlocality, showing that even minimal independence can reproduce quantum correlations, linking it to classical communication and detection loopholes.
Contribution
It establishes the minimal measurement independence required to reproduce singlet correlations, connecting it to classical communication and detection loopholes.
Findings
Reproduces singlet correlations with less than one bit of mutual information.
Links measurement dependence to classical communication models.
Shows even fully independent choices can reproduce quantum correlations.
Abstract
If nonlocality is to be inferred from a violation of Bell's inequality, an important assumption is that the measurement settings are freely chosen by the observers, or alternatively, that they are random and uncorrelated with the hypothetical local variables. We study the case where this assumption is weakened, so that measurement settings and local variables are at least partially correlated. As we show, there is a connection between this type of model and models which reproduce nonlocal correlations by allowing classical communication between the distant parties, and a connection with models that exploit the detection loophole. We show that even if Bob's choices are completely independent, all correlations obtained from projective measurements on a singlet can be reproduced, with the correlation (measured by mutual information) between Alice's choice and local variables less than or…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
