Metallicities of Planet Hosting Stars: A Sample of Giants and Subgiants
L. Ghezzi, K. Cunha, S. C. Schuler, V. V. Smith

TL;DR
This study compares the metallicities of giant, subgiant, and dwarf stars hosting planets, revealing that giants are more metal-poor and suggesting that stellar mass influences planet formation environments.
Contribution
It provides a homogeneous analysis of atmospheric parameters and metallicities across different stellar evolutionary stages, highlighting the role of stellar mass in planet formation.
Findings
Main-sequence and subgiant stars have similar mean metallicity (~+0.11 dex).
Giant stars are generally more metal-poor (~-0.06 dex) than dwarfs and subgiants.
Metallicity differences are linked to stellar mass and protoplanetary disk properties.
Abstract
This work presents a homogeneous derivation of atmospheric parameters and iron abundances for a sample of giant and subgiant stars which host giant planets, as well as a control sample of subgiant stars not known to host giant planets. The analysis is done using the same technique as for our previous analysis of a large sample of planet-hosting and control sample dwarf stars. A comparison between the distributions of [Fe/H] in planet-hosting main-sequence stars, subgiants, and giants within these samples finds that the main-sequence stars and subgiants have the same mean metallicity of <[Fe/H]> \simeq +0.11 dex, while the giant sample is typically more metal poor, having an average metallicity of <[Fe/H]> = -0.06 dex. The fact that the subgiants have the same average metallicities as the dwarfs indicates that significant accretion of solid metal-rich material onto the planet-hosting…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
