Embedded contact homology and open book decompositions
Vincent Colin, Paolo Ghiggini, Ko Honda

TL;DR
This paper establishes a key step towards proving the equivalence of Heegaard Floer homology and embedded contact homology by relating ECH on a closed contact 3-manifold to ECH on the complement of an open book's binding.
Contribution
It proves the equivalence between ECH of a closed contact 3-manifold and a version of ECH defined on the complement of an open book binding, advancing the series' goal.
Findings
Established the ECH equivalence on open book complements.
Provided a full proof of Morse-Bott gluing needed for the isomorphism.
Fixed a mistake and added coauthor in the appendix.
Abstract
This is the first of a series of papers devoted to proving the equivalence of Heegaard Floer homology and embedded contact homology (abbreviated ECH). In this paper we prove that, given a closed, oriented, contact -manifold, there is an equivalence between ECH of the closed -manifold and a version of ECH, defined on the complement of the binding of an adapted open book decomposition. In the appendix we give a full proof of the Morse-Bott gluing result that we need in this article and in the subsequent ones of the series proving the isomorphism between Heegaard Floer homology and ECH. V.8: we fixed a mistake in the appendix and added Yuan Yao as a coauthor.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
