A counterexample to Wegner's conjecture on good covers
Martin Tancer

TL;DR
This paper disproves Wegner's 1975 conjecture by providing a counterexample, showing that the nerve of a finite good cover in R^d need not be d-collapsible, challenging previous assumptions in topological combinatorics.
Contribution
The authors construct a specific counterexample demonstrating that the nerve of a good cover in R^d can fail to be d-collapsible, refuting Wegner's long-standing conjecture.
Findings
Counterexample shows the nerve is not always d-collapsible
Disproves Wegner's conjecture from 1975
Impacts understanding of good covers in topology
Abstract
In 1975 Wegner conjectured that the nerve of every finite good cover in R^d is d-collapsible. We disprove this conjecture. A good cover is a collection of open sets in R^d such that the intersection of every subcollection is either empty or homeomorphic to an open d-ball. A simplicial complex is d-collapsible if it can be reduced to an empty complex by repeatedly removing a face of dimension at most d-1 which is contained in a unique maximal face.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopological and Geometric Data Analysis · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
