Comparing cohomology obstructions
Hans-Joachim Baues, David Blanc

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the isomorphism among three types of cohomology theories and uses this to unify different approaches to realizability problems in algebraic topology.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence of Baues-Wirsching, Dwyer-Kan, and Andre-Quillen cohomologies under certain conditions, linking various realizability obstructions.
Findings
Proves isomorphism of three cohomology theories.
Unifies different approaches to realizability problems.
Introduces the notion of a mapping algebra as a key tool.
Abstract
We show that three different kinds of cohomology - Baues-Wirsching cohomology, the (S,O)-cohomology of Dwyer-Kan, and the Andre-Quillen cohomology of a Pi-algebra - are isomorphic, under certain assumptions. This is then used to identify the cohomological obstructions in three general approaches to realizability problems: the track category version of Baues-Wirsching, the diagram rectifications of Dwyer-Kan-Smith, and the Pi-Algebra realization of Dwyer-Kan-Stover. Our main tool in this identification is the notion of a mapping algebra: a simplicially enriched version of an algebra over a theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
