Harmonic Analysis and Qualitative Uncertainty Principle
Ji King

TL;DR
This paper explores the mathematical foundations of the qualitative uncertainty principle (QUP) in harmonic analysis, linking it to integral kernel properties and examining its validity across various transforms and potential bypass methods.
Contribution
It establishes a complete point theory for integral kernels related to QUP, analyzing conditions for its validity and limitations in harmonic analysis.
Findings
QUP depends on the existence of complete points in integral kernels.
QUP holds only for well-behaved integral operators.
Sparse representation and nonlinear methods may bypass QUP limitations.
Abstract
This paper investigates the mathematical nature of qualitative uncertainty principle (QUP), which plays an important role in mathematics, physics and engineering fields. Consider a 3-tuple (K, H1, H2) that K: H1 -> H2 is an integral operator. Suppose a signal f in H1, {\Omega}1 and {\Omega}2 are domains on which f, Kf define respectively. Does this signal f vanish if |{\Sigma}(f)|<|{\Omega}1|and|{\Sigma}(Kf)|<|{\Omega}2|? The excesses and deficiencies of integral kernel K({\omega}, t) are found to be greatly related to this general formulation of QUP. The complete point theory of integral kernel is so established to deal with the QUP. This theory addresses the density and linear independence of integral kernels. Some algebraic and geometric properties of complete points are presented. It is shown that the satisfaction of QUP depends on the existence of some complete points. By…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Analysis and Transform Methods · Image and Signal Denoising Methods · Digital Filter Design and Implementation
