Entanglement cost of implementing controlled-unitary operations
Akihito Soeda, Peter S. Turner, and Mio Murao

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the minimum entanglement needed to implement two-qubit controlled-unitary operations deterministically using LOCC, revealing a gap between entanglement cost and entangling power due to input obliviousness.
Contribution
It establishes a lower bound of 1 ebit of entanglement for implementing controlled-unitaries with a specific LOCC protocol, highlighting a fundamental gap in quantum resource requirements.
Findings
Any controlled-unitary can be implemented with a three-turn LOCC protocol.
At least 1 ebit of entanglement is necessary for such implementation.
A gap exists between entanglement cost and entangling power due to input obliviousness.
Abstract
We investigate the minimum entanglement cost of the deterministic implementation of two-qubit controlled-unitary operations using local operations and classical communication (LOCC). We show that any such operation can be implemented by a three-turn LOCC protocol, which requires at least 1 ebit of entanglement when the resource is given by a bipartite entangled state with Schmidt number 2. Our result implies that there is a gap between the minimum entanglement cost and the entangling power of controlled-unitary operations. This gap arises due to the requirement of implementing the operations while oblivious to the identity of the inputs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
