Multiwavelength Study of Chandra X-Ray Sources in the Antennae
D.M. Clark, S.S. Eikenberry, B.R. Brandl, J.C. Wilson, J.C. Carson,, C.P. Henderson, T. L. Hayward, D.J. Barry, A.F. Ptak, E.J.M. Colbert

TL;DR
This study combines infrared, optical, and X-ray data to identify and analyze star clusters in the Antennae galaxy, revealing that X-ray sources are often associated with massive, young star clusters.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive multiwavelength analysis of X-ray sources and their star cluster counterparts in the Antennae, nearly doubling known IR counterparts and characterizing their properties.
Findings
38 X-ray sources have IR counterparts, mostly bright star clusters.
Most clusters with X-ray sources are massive (~10^6 M_sun) and young (~10^6 yr).
Optical counterparts are identified for 27 IR star clusters.
Abstract
We use WIRC, IR images of the Antennae (NGC 4038/4039) together with the extensive catalogue of 120 X-ray point sources (Zezas et al. 2006) to search for counterpart candidates. Using our proven frame-tie technique, we find 38 X-ray sources with IR counterparts, almost doubling the number of IR counterparts to X-ray sources first identified in Clark et al. (2007). In our photometric analysis, we consider the 35 IR counterparts that are confirmed star clusters. We show that the clusters with X-ray sources tend to be brighter, K_s ~16 mag, with (J-K_s) = 1.1 mag. We then use archival HST images of the Antennae to search for optical counterparts to the X-ray point sources. We employ our previous IR-to-X-ray frame-tie as an intermediary to establish a precise optical-to-X-ray frame-tie with <0.6 arcsec rms positional uncertainty. Due to the high optical source density near the X-ray…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
