Results from the Supernova Photometric Classification Challenge
Richard Kessler, Bruce Bassett, Pavel Belov, Vasudha Bhatnagar,, Heather Campbell, Alex Conley, Joshua A. Frieman, Alexandre Glazov, Santiago, Gonzalez-Gaitan, Renee Hlozek, Saurabh Jha, Stephen Kuhlmann, Martin Kunz,, Hubert Lampeitl, Ashish Mahabal, James Newling

TL;DR
This paper presents the results of the Supernova Photometric Classification Challenge, evaluating various algorithms' ability to classify supernovae types and estimate redshifts using simulated survey data.
Contribution
It introduces a standardized simulated dataset for supernova classification and provides an evaluation framework for different algorithms' performance.
Findings
High classification efficiency (up to 0.96) for SNe Ia.
Better performance on training data than unconfirmed samples.
Public release of improved simulations and evaluation tools.
Abstract
We report results from the Supernova Photometric Classification Challenge (SNPCC), a publicly released mix of simulated supernovae (SNe), with types (Ia, Ibc, and II) selected in proportion to their expected rate. The simulation was realized in the griz filters of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) with realistic observing conditions (sky noise, point-spread function and atmospheric transparency) based on years of recorded conditions at the DES site. Simulations of non-Ia type SNe are based on spectroscopically confirmed light curves that include unpublished non-Ia samples donated from the Carnegie Supernova Project (CSP), the Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS), and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II (SDSS-II). A spectroscopically confirmed subset was provided for training. We challenged scientists to run their classification algorithms and report a type and photo-z for each SN. Participants from 10…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
