Classical system boundaries cannot be determined within quantum Darwinism
Chris Fields

TL;DR
Quantum Darwinism fails to establish a purely quantum-mechanical basis for classicality emergence because multiple observers cannot independently verify the classical boundary of a system without prior assumptions.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that quantum Darwinism cannot define classical system boundaries solely through quantum mechanics, challenging its explanatory power for classical emergence.
Findings
Observers cannot jointly verify system boundaries without prior assumptions
Quantum Darwinism does not provide a purely quantum explanation for classicality
Classical boundaries require a priori classical assumptions
Abstract
Multiple observers who interact with environmental encodings of the states of a macroscopic quantum system S as required by quantum Darwinism cannot demonstrate that they are jointly observing S without a joint a priori assumption of a classical boundary separating S from its environment E. Quantum Darwinism cannot, therefore, be regarded as providing a purely quantum-mechanical explanation of the "emergence" of classicality.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
