Stable partitions in additively separable hedonic games
Haris Aziz, Felix Brandt, Hans Georg Seedig

TL;DR
This paper advances understanding of stable partitions in additively separable hedonic games by providing efficient algorithms for some stability concepts and proving NP-hardness for others, highlighting the computational complexity landscape.
Contribution
It introduces a polynomial-time algorithm for contractually individually stable partitions and proves NP-hardness for core existence and related stability checks.
Findings
Polynomial-time algorithm for contractually individually stable partition
NP-hardness of core and strict core existence
coNP-completeness of verifying grand coalition stability
Abstract
An important aspect in systems of multiple autonomous agents is the exploitation of synergies via coalition formation. In this paper, we solve various open problems concerning the computational complexity of stable partitions in additively separable hedonic games. First, we propose a polynomial-time algorithm to compute a contractually individually stable partition. This contrasts with previous results such as the NP-hardness of computing individually stable or Nash stable partitions. Secondly, we prove that checking whether the core or the strict core exists is NP-hard in the strong sense even if the preferences of the players are symmetric. Finally, it is shown that verifying whether a partition consisting of the grand coalition is contractually strict core stable or Pareto optimal is coNP-complete.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
