On the Ambainis-Bach-Nayak-Vishwanath-Watrous Conjecture
Clement Ampadu

TL;DR
This paper identifies a flaw in a previous theorem related to quantum walks, corrects it for a specific case, and demonstrates that a notable conjecture in the field is false, advancing understanding of quantum walk properties.
Contribution
It uncovers a flaw in a prior theorem, provides a correction for finite Hadamard walks, and disproves a significant conjecture in quantum walk theory.
Findings
Theorem in [3] is flawed and corrected for Finite Hadamard walk.
The conjecture by Ambainis et al. is shown to be false.
Provides insights into the limitations of certain quantum walk models.
Abstract
We show the flaw in a theorem of Konno, Namiki, Soshi, and Sudbury in [3] and provide the necessary correction in the case of the Finite Hadamard walk and use it to show that a conjecture of Ambainis, Bach, Nayak, Vishwanath, and Watrous in [1] is false.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Advanced Mathematical Identities · Analytic Number Theory Research
