Comment on "Gap opening in graphene by shear strain"
Ashwin Ramasubramaniam

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous study claiming that shear and uniaxial strain can open a band gap in graphene, showing that when buckling and wrinkling are considered, the band gap disappears and graphene remains gapless.
Contribution
The study demonstrates that buckling and wrinkling effects negate the previously predicted band gap opening in strained graphene.
Findings
Band gap predicted at 15-20% shear strain vanishes when buckling is considered.
Graphene remains gapless under large shear and combined strains.
Mechanical effects like buckling are crucial in electronic structure predictions.
Abstract
G. Cocco, E. Cadelano, and L. Colombo [Phys. Rev. B 81, 241412(R) (2010)] have suggested that combinations of shear and uniaxial strain can be used to open a band gap in graphene at much lower levels of strain than with the application of unaxial strain alone. They employed a unit cell of graphene in their studies and applied the Cauchy-Born rule to model external strain. Consequently, an important aspect of the mechanical behavior of membranes, namely buckling and wrinkling under external strain, and the attendant coupling with electronic structure was ignored in their analysis. Upon doing so, the apparent band gap that appears in the range of 15-20% shear strain under the Cauchy-Born assumption is shown to vanish. The gapless spectrum of graphene is found to persist under large shear strains as well as large combinations of shear and uniaxial strain.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGraphene research and applications · Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
