Individualization as driving force of clustering phenomena in humans
Michael M\"as, Andreas Flache, Dirk Helbing

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new computational model explaining how individualization and social influence interact to produce metastable opinion clusters in humans, bridging the gap between social diversity and connectedness.
Contribution
It presents an adaptive noise model that enables the formation of metastable opinion clusters, addressing limitations of previous models that predicted monoculture or rampant individualism.
Findings
Metastable clusters form with diversity within and consensus within groups.
Small clusters tend to fuse, large clusters tend to split due to individualization.
The model reproduces observed social diversity despite high connectivity.
Abstract
One of the most intriguing dynamics in biological systems is the emergence of clustering, the self-organization into separated agglomerations of individuals. Several theories have been developed to explain clustering in, for instance, multi-cellular organisms, ant colonies, bee hives, flocks of birds, schools of fish, and animal herds. A persistent puzzle, however, is clustering of opinions in human populations. The puzzle is particularly pressing if opinions vary continuously, such as the degree to which citizens are in favor of or against a vaccination program. Existing opinion formation models suggest that "monoculture" is unavoidable in the long run, unless subsets of the population are perfectly separated from each other. Yet, social diversity is a robust empirical phenomenon, although perfect separation is hardly possible in an increasingly connected world. Considering randomness…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
