Disc-oscillation resonance and neutron star QPOs: 3:2 epicyclic orbital model
Martin Urbanec, Gabriel Torok, Eva Sramkova, Petr Cech, Zdenek, Stuchlik, Pavel Bakala

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the 3:2 epicyclic resonance model for neutron star QPOs, comparing theoretical frequencies with observations, and suggests the model's limitations under certain equations of state and spin conditions.
Contribution
It critically assesses the 3:2 resonance model for neutron star QPOs using various equations of state and finds conditions where the model is inconsistent with observations.
Findings
The inferred neutron star radius exceeds the marginally stable orbit radius for nuclear matter EOS.
For strange matter EOS, the neutron star radius is approximately equal to the marginally stable orbit radius.
The model's assumptions are only compatible with strange matter EOS, low masses, and high spin frequencies.
Abstract
The high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations (HF QPOs) that appear in the X-ray fluxes of low-mass X-ray binaries remain an unexplained phenomenon. Among other ideas, it has been suggested that a non-linear resonance between two oscillation modes in an accretion disc orbiting either a black hole or a neutron star plays a role in exciting the observed modulation. Several possible resonances have been discussed. A particular model assumes resonances in which the disc-oscillation modes have the eigenfrequencies equal to the radial and vertical epicyclic frequencies of geodesic orbital motion. This model has been discussed for black hole microquasar sources as well as for a group of neutron star sources. Assuming several neutron (strange) star equations of state and Hartle-Thorne geometry of rotating stars, we briefly compare the frequencies expected from the model to those observed. Our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
