Intrinsic selection biases of ground-based gravitational wave searches for high-mass BH-BH mergers
Richard O'Shaughnessy (1,4), Birjoo Vaishnav (2), James Healy (3),, Deirdre Shoemaker (3) ((1) Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State, University, (2) Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy, The University of, Texas at Brownsville

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how intrinsic selection biases in ground-based gravitational wave searches affect the detection volume for high-mass black hole mergers, especially considering black hole spins and their impact on detection sensitivity.
Contribution
It provides a spin-dependent fit for detection volume as a function of mass and spin, accounting for waveform harmonics and uncertainties, aiding interpretation of future IMBH merger detections.
Findings
Detection volume depends strongly on black hole spins.
Fits are reliable for specific mass and spin ranges for LIGO detectors.
Selection bias favors aligned spins, influencing detection interpretation.
Abstract
The next generation of ground-based gravitational wave detectors may detect a few mergers of comparable-mass M\simeq 100-1000 Msun ("intermediate-mass'', or IMBH) spinning black holes. Black hole spin is known to have a significant impact on the orbit, merger signal, and post-merger ringdown of any binary with non-negligible spin. In particular, the detection volume for spinning binaries depends significantly on the component black hole spins. We provide a fit to the single-detector and isotropic-network detection volume versus (total) mass and arbitrary spin for equal-mass binaries. Our analysis assumes matched filtering to all significant available waveform power (up to l=6 available for fitting, but only l<= 4 significant) estimated by an array of 64 numerical simulations with component spins as large as S_{1,2}/M^2 <= 0.8. We provide a spin-dependent estimate of our uncertainty, up…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
