Size bias, sampling, the waiting time paradox, and infinite divisibility: when is the increment independent?
Richard Arratia, Larry Goldstein

TL;DR
This paper characterizes distributions where size biasing leads to an independent increment, linking size bias, infinite divisibility, and various probabilistic phenomena like the waiting time paradox and renewal theory.
Contribution
It provides a complete characterization of distributions allowing an independent increment after size biasing, extending Steutel's results and connecting to multiple areas in probability theory.
Findings
Identifies all distributions where size biasing yields an independent increment.
Links size biasing to infinite divisibility and the waiting time paradox.
Discusses implications for renewal theory, sampling, and lognormal distributions.
Abstract
With denoting a random variable with the -size bias distribution, what are all distributions for such that it is possible to have , , with and {\em independent}? We give the answer, due to Steutel \cite{steutel}, and also discuss the relations of size biasing to the waiting time paradox, renewal theory, sampling, tightness and uniform integrability, compound Poisson distributions, infinite divisibility, and the lognormal distributions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Methods and Mixture Models · Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
