On EPR Paradox, No Entanglement Theorem for Separate Particles and Consequences

TL;DR

This paper argues that the EPR paradox is based on an error, claiming that entangled states of separated particles do not exist, challenging the nonlocality and the validity of Bell's inequality violations in quantum mechanics.

Contribution

It presents a correction to the EPR argument, claiming that entanglement and nonlocality are false, and proposes a classical field theory interpretation of quantum phenomena.

Findings

Bell's inequalities are never violated according to this paper.

Experimental results claiming violation of Bell's inequalities are considered false.

Entangled states of separated particles do not exist as per the author's analysis.

Abstract

EPR paper contains an error. Its correction leads to a conclusion that position and momentum of a particle can be defined precisely simultaneously, EPR paradox does not exist and uncertainty relations have nothing to do with quantum mechanics. Logic of the EPR paper shows that entangled states of separated particles do not exist and therefore there are no nonlocality in quantum mechanics. Bell's inequalities are never violated, and results of experiments, proving their violation, are shown to be false. Experiments to prove absence of nonlocality are proposed where Bell's inequalities are replaced by precise prediction. Interpretation of quantum mechanics in terms of classical field theory is suggested. Censorship against this paper is demonstrated.