On canonical transformations of gravitational variables in extended phase space
T. P. Shestakova

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that different Hamiltonian formulations of General Relativity, using various parametrizations, are related by canonical transformations in an extended phase space that includes gauge degrees of freedom, ensuring their equivalence.
Contribution
It provides a proof that Hamiltonian formulations with different parametrizations are canonically equivalent in extended phase space, including gauge variables.
Findings
Different parametrizations are related by canonical transformations in extended phase space.
The equivalence holds for a wide class of gauges and parametrizations.
This resolves concerns about non-equivalence of Hamiltonian formulations of GR.
Abstract
Last years a certain attention was attracted to the statement that Hamiltonian formulations of General Relativity, in which different parametrizations of gravitational variables were used, may not be related by a canonical transformation. The example was given by the Hamiltonian formulation of Dirac and that of Arnowitt - Deser - Misner. It might witness for non-equivalence of these formulations and the original (Lagrangian) formulation of General Relativity. The problem is believed to be of importance since many authors make use of various representations of gravitational field as a starting point in searching a way to reconcile the theory of gravity with quantum principles. It can be shown that the mentioned above conclusion about non-equivalence of different Hamiltonian formulations is based on the consideration of canonical transformations in phase space of physical degrees of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
