A detailed spectropolarimetric analysis of the planet hosting star WASP-12
L. Fossati, S. Bagnulo, A. Elmasli, C. A. Haswell, S. Holmes, O., Kochukhov, E. L. Shkolnik, D. V. Shulyak, D. Bohlender, B. Albayrak, C., Froning, L. Hebb

TL;DR
This study provides a detailed spectropolarimetric analysis of star WASP-12, confirming its fundamental parameters, searching for magnetic fields, and investigating atmospheric pollution and circumstellar material related to its exoplanet system.
Contribution
It offers the first high-precision spectropolarimetric search for magnetic fields on WASP-12 and analyzes stellar pollution signatures, improving parameter constraints and exploring star-planet interactions.
Findings
No structured magnetic field detected on WASP-12
Hints of atmospheric pollution in the star's photosphere
No infrared excess detected for circumstellar disk
Abstract
The knowledge of accurate stellar parameters is paramount in several fields of stellar astrophysics, particularly in the study of extrasolar planets, where often the star is the only visible component and therefore used to infer the planet's fundamental parameters. Another important aspect of the analysis of planetary systems is the stellar activity and the possible star-planet interaction. Here we present a self-consistent abundance analysis of the planet hosting star WASP-12 and a high-precision search for a structured stellar magnetic field on the basis of spectropolarimetric observations obtained with the ESPaDOnS spectropolarimeter. Our results show that the star does not have a structured magnetic field, and that the obtained fundamental parameters are in good agreement with what was previously published. In addition we derive improved constraints on the stellar age (1.0-2.65…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
