Spectroscopy of z~5 Lyman Break Galaxies in the ESO Remote Galaxy Survey
L.S. Douglas (1, 2), M.N. Bremer (2), M.D.Lehnert (1), E.R. Stanway, (2), Bo Milvang-Jensen (3) ((1) Obs. de Paris, (2) University of Bristol, (3), Dark Cosmology Centre, Copenhagen)

TL;DR
This study presents spectroscopic data on z~5 Lyman break galaxies, revealing their properties, lower metallicities compared to z~3, and evidence of clustering and complex morphologies, enhancing understanding of early galaxy formation.
Contribution
First comprehensive spectroscopic survey of z~5 LBGs across multiple fields, analyzing their properties, metallicities, and clustering, with implications for early galaxy evolution.
Findings
z~5 LBGs have bluer UV slopes than z~3 counterparts.
Metallicities of z~5 LBGs are about three times lower than at z~3.
Strong clustering and multiple systems observed among z~5 LBGs.
Abstract
(ABRIDGED) We present the global results of a large spectroscopic survey carried out in order to identify z~ 5 Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) across ten widely-separated fields to I_{AB}=26.3. The redshifts of seventy 4.6<z<5.6 LBGs were identified. We find no significant difference in the frequency of high equivalent-width line emitters between z~3 and our z~5 samples. The rest-frame UV continuum slope of a typical z~5 line-emitting galaxy is bluer than that of a typical break-only galaxy, a difference that is difficult to explain purely by differences in the ages of their stellar populations. Variation in metallicity and/or dust extinction can more straightforwardly account for this difference. Given their UV-continuum slopes, the typical z~5 LBGs have metallicities a factor of three lower than those of LBGs at z~3. HST imaging indicates that a large majority of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
