Is BTZ a separate superselection sector of CTMG?
S. Deser, J. Franklin

TL;DR
This paper investigates the nature of BTZ black holes within cosmological TMG, providing evidence that they form a separate superselection sector and justifying the retention of TMG's original G-sign for stability.
Contribution
It demonstrates that BTZ solutions are a distinct superselection sector in cosmological TMG, not reachable from physical matter-coupled solutions, and supports the original G-sign choice for stability.
Findings
BTZ solutions evolve to conical singularities or negative mass.
BTZ constitutes a separate superselection sector in TMG.
Retaining the original G-sign ensures excitation stability.
Abstract
We exhibit exact solutions of (positive) matter coupled to cosmological TMG; they necessarily evolve to conical singularity/negative mass, rather than physical black hole, BTZ. By providing evidence that the latter constitutes a separate, "superselection", sector not reachable from the physical one, they also provide justification for retaining TMG's original "wrong" G-sign to ensure excitation stability here as well.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
