Asymptotic Giant Branch stars at low metallicity: the challenging interplay between mass loss and molecular opacities
Paolo Ventura, Paola Marigo

TL;DR
This study examines how mass loss and molecular opacities influence the chemical yields of low-metallicity Asymptotic Giant Branch stars, highlighting uncertainties especially in less massive stars and the importance of opacity treatment.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the uncertainties in AGB star yields due to mass loss and molecular opacities, especially at low metallicity, and identifies key mass ranges where these effects are critical.
Findings
Yields of massive AGB stars are mainly influenced by convection efficiency.
Uncertainties in yields are largest for stars with 2.0-3.0Msun, especially for nitrogen and sodium.
Mass loss and convective boundary treatments critically affect third dredge-up in low-mass stars.
Abstract
We investigate the main physical properties of low-metallicity Asymptotic Giant Branch stars, with the aim of quantifying the uncertainties that presently affect the predicted chemical yields of these stars, associated to mass loss and description of molecular opacities. We find that above a threshold mass, M ~ 3.5Msun for Z=0.001, the results are little dependent on the opacity treatment, as long as hot-bottom burning prevents the surface C/O ratio from exceeding unity; the yields of these massive AGB stars are expected to be mostly determined by the efficiency of convection, with a relatively mild dependence on the mass-loss description. A much higher degree of uncertainty is associated to the yields of less massive models, which critically depend on the adopted molecular opacities. An interval of masses exists, say 2.0-3.0Msun, (the exact range depends on mass loss), in which HBB may…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
